<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Use Google Groups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tekdig.com/google-groups/why-use-google-groups/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tekdig.com/google-groups/why-use-google-groups</link>
	<description>Digging into technology to get things done.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 05:15:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://tekdig.com/google-groups/why-use-google-groups/comment-page-1#comment-2105</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekdig.com/?p=13#comment-2105</guid>
		<description>Its been over a year since I wrote this post, but as far as I know it is still current and there are no major changes (for better or worse).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its been over a year since I wrote this post, but as far as I know it is still current and there are no major changes (for better or worse).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl</title>
		<link>http://tekdig.com/google-groups/why-use-google-groups/comment-page-1#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekdig.com/?p=13#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>Good summary.  I haven&#039;t checked out Groups, yet, but I assume this is all current, or that Google has gotten better (not worse) for Groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summary.  I haven&#8217;t checked out Groups, yet, but I assume this is all current, or that Google has gotten better (not worse) for Groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

